crossixir.com

post by @nitrrogen__

back to @nitrrogen__'s posts
nitrrogen @nitrrogen__
Without it, the Soviets would be forced to divert many of the resources that historically went to war materiel, to producing key lend-lease goods domestically.

Will offensives be smaller in scale and costlier? Yes.

Will the USSR lose? Statistically impossible.
Sep 5 2024 12:54:48 AM
  • replies 1
  • retweets 0
  • quote tweets 0
  • likes 9145
  • bookmarks 0
  • impressions 0

posted by:

(user follower/following numbers are from most recent capture, name/bio are from time this tweet was posted where possible)

Explaining Russian Brutality
registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM
255 following
472 followers

in reply to:

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__
There's more or these kinds of arguments, but to sum it up.

No matter what, Germany didn't have the resources to continue this war. Lend-lease or not, the USSR would've won in the East.

Lend-lease allowed the USSR to focus on producing tanks & planes & planning offensives.
Sep 5 2024 12:52:52 AM
  • replies 0
  • retweets 0
  • quote tweets 0
  • likes 0
  • bookmarks 0
  • impressions 0

users mentioned:

replied-to user:

Explaining Russian 🇷🇺 brutality in the Caucasus and Central Asia
  • location Wagner PMC deployment in Syria
registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM
255 following
472 followers

references to this tweet:

replies:

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__
Thank you for reading! pic.x.com/qa4vvksq0k
Sep 5 2024 12:55:25 AM
  • replies 0
  • retweets 1
  • quote tweets 0
  • likes 2
  • bookmarks 0
  • impressions 25

sources


later tweet earlier tweet