post by @nitrrogen__

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__

There's more or these kinds of arguments, but to sum it up.

No matter what, Germany didn't have the resources to continue this war. Lend-lease or not, the USSR would've won in the East.

Lend-lease allowed the USSR to focus on producing tanks & planes & planning offensives.

Sep 5 2024 12:52:52 AM

0
0
0
9145
0
0

posted by:

(user follower/following numbers are from most recent capture, name/bio are from time this tweet was posted where possible)

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__

Explaining Russian Brutality

registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM

255 following

472 followers

in reply to:

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__

The USSR produced around 134,000 trucks during the war. The Lend-Lease program provided about 375,000 trucks, that's because there was no need to domestically increase it, Soviets could have increased their own production or adapted their logistics to manage with fewer trucks.

Sep 5 2024 12:51:33 AM

users mentioned:

replied-to user:

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__

Explaining Russian 🇷🇺 brutality in the Caucasus and Central Asia

Wagner PMC deployment in Syria

registered Jul 5 2024 4:21 PM

255 following

472 followers

references to this tweet:

replies:

nitrrogen @nitrrogen__

Without it, the Soviets would be forced to divert many of the resources that historically went to war materiel, to producing key lend-lease goods domestically.

Will offensives be smaller in scale and costlier? Yes.

Will the USSR lose? Statistically impossible.

Sep 5 2024 12:54:48 AM

sources

later tweet earlier tweet