overview for @allpigsmus76164

RT @allpigsmus76164: pic.x.com/gtKMqhe4Ss

Gio Scotti: pic.x.com/0k6aPGOhxZ x.com/allpigsmus7616… (⊹)

@GenocideAfrica @Zassishere @allpigsmus76164 I'm not a Hitlerite, I'm a Kohlist anti-imperialist (for intraeuropean conflicts only)

@vanhanenist @Zassishere @allpigsmus76164 Hitler claimed Stalin destroyed Judeo-Bolshevism.

@GenocideAfrica @Zassishere @allpigsmus76164 He wasn't communist, like Russia was

@vanhanenist @Zassishere @allpigsmus76164 Bandera was a disgusting individual I don't see why anyone should support him.

@vanhanenist @allpigsmus76164 Christinity is a dying religion, liberalism is worse than China.

@allpigsmus76164 @GenocideAfrica I love it but want the demos whiter and more Christian.

@Zassishere @allpigsmus76164 @GenocideAfrica Well replace them with monuments to Bandera then?

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 Tatarstan is one of the most high iq and economically productive regions in Russia. North Russia is on par with the rest.

@GenocideAfrica @allpigsmus76164 I'd even give credence to that angle, but try their neighbors (of the European ethnic repubs) and those to a greater expanse of Northern Russia.

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 It's just Anatolian/Caucasian DNA that's what Armenian-Antiquity stands for here

@GenocideAfrica @allpigsmus76164 Well if there are simply ethnic Armenians, would it be possible that they're lumped into the statistics and to a further question, irrespective of ethnos in these days? Recent admixture is another important question. I just don't see how it's possible that there's "Armenians".

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 Tatars are high-iq and are high in fugric

@GenocideAfrica @allpigsmus76164 There's ancient admixture from the Caucasus for plenty of people across Europe overall. I would be more particular with what you'd say. Also, I'd remark the same for Finno-Ugrics and their "high iq". Where this pertains to Russia, this would exclude the example of e.g., Finns.

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 I didn't generate it a friend of mine did

@GenocideAfrica @allpigsmus76164 Armenians? Late-medieval? Russian & Soviet?

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 These G25s are very accurate tbh.

@GenocideAfrica @allpigsmus76164 That there's already a variation of types, which is to include just the same, the ancient mixtures which you mistake as being directly "Armenian". It's a likeness, just as they could be called "Asiatic" (but as a far-flung, and as equally properly-far, per science, remark).

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 Correct, but I like finno-ugrics, they are high iq, and Ukrainian DNA from the Caucasus is due to Crimean Tatars who originated there

@GenocideAfrica @allpigsmus76164 "They're part Armenian" is crude, it's wrong. It's a likeness, and to averages overall which come to disparities of types, in that of individuals and certain respective clusters. Likewise, plenty of "Russians" have lots of Finno-Ugric admixture, above the fact,

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 It's just the individualism and individuality distinction really... individuality is good, but individualism is bad.

@GenocideAfrica @allpigsmus76164 Individualism was empowered at the conquest and drive of the frontiers, just as by the culmination of the United States, and greatly. Yet, as valued, there was a 'communitarian' character, something held and foremost there. Individualism as a modern ideology is another mirage.

@allpigsmus76164 @good_virtues Moldovan is the closest to South Ukraine.

@allpigsmus76164 @good_virtues Well, that's my take, but I think some of it can be saved despite the fact that they're part Armenian with an IQ a whole SD below their neighbours. pic.x.com/YcIoQaFP7w

@allpigsmus76164 @good_virtues I mean individualistic liberalism is a very anglo concept that's been the most prevalent in anglosphere countries like America, Canada, UK, Australia, England, etc. The rest of Europe is affected too but it's not as extreme as the police states of England and Australia.

@allpigsmus76164 @good_virtues ...project power and is less ideological, but it will simply never economically recover and russification could kill a lot of the national identity in the southeast. It's one or the other.

@allpigsmus76164 @good_virtues Really it's both. Ukraine has already lost. Even if they military beat Russia they're going to be forcibly converted into deracinated western egalitarianism, if they lose their sovereignty to Russia however, they'll maybe be slightly better off socially since Russia can't...

@allpigsmus76164 @good_virtues It's a defective anglo trait, but most people aren't ready for this discussion.

@allpigsmus76164 @good_virtues Only low-IQ people fall for it but I've seen it happen really

@allpigsmus76164 @good_virtues Yeah, that's their rhetoric in regards to America, but their polemics in Europe are "Russia is a neobolshevik empire that wants to destroy Europe" with soft undertones of liberalism

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 It's essentially just petty nationalism. You can't unsee it when you do. UkroNats pander to European RWers for support, they broadly don't care for what happens there.

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 Ukraine lost many more men in WW2 comparatively to this war, the outcome will be determined in military strategy and the miltary indsturial manufacturing sector, and Europe falls short in both to Russia.

@GenocideAfrica @allpigsmus76164 As to entail that of a ceasefire, may be even better to work with, per whatever their priorities happen to be. Is this just a political affair, or a civic affair? That differentiation is an important one to make. Are they simply fighting for their country, to a *petty* sense,

@GenocideAfrica @allpigsmus76164 To particulars, I see the outcome as largely dependent upon demographics, and wherein there's sheer losses related to the war. 'Scaling back', by the sense of a strategy of Ukrainian nationalists to refuse to fight somehow, onto merely preparing for a perceivably subpar outcome,

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 The issue is that people place ideology over pragmatism so these sorts of rational arguments rarely convince people that the loss of Ukraine (which is already an effectively liberal state), to Russia, is 100% worth the ripple effects it'd have in Europe and America.

@GenocideAfrica @allpigsmus76164 My angle is much more to a critique of circumstances, as that to the fact that they were integrated, instead of an ideological one. Likewise, as personally, I'm not fond of Russia. I'm critical to a point of 'absolution' about the kind of lesser *worries* people have about it.

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 ...to cooperate.

Ukraines loss would shake up the west and abolish the illusion of American protection that Europe currently has. This should be the priority. Only when America leaves can Europe pursue any meaningful RW policy.

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 They're essentially faux-nationalists who use NS symbolism whilst supporting Chechens against Russia because of their own butthurtedness. They serve Zelenskys government when they could've couped him and Poroshenko before the invasion even began, but they actively choose...

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 Azov is allowed to exist because they have no ideology, they're nationalists who's nationalism revolves around the dogmatic hatred of Russia and not love for their country. They countersignal any group that's neutral on the war even if it's good for the broader "white race".

@GenocideAfrica @allpigsmus76164 It's depressing, even.

@good_virtues @allpigsmus76164 Truthnuke pic.x.com/I8IYVrmLQ6

RT @good_virtues: @allpigsmus76164 Every loss of a Ukrainian nationalist is a *better* lost. They're better than the liberal cowards who li…

@allpigsmus76164 Nobody is saying this

@allpigsmus76164 Every loss of a Ukrainian nationalist is a *better* lost. They're better than the liberal cowards who literally flee on perpetual holiday elsewhere, and whom an assured minority in the least would return, and in whether tensions are eased.

RT @allpigsmus76164: if you hate the english you’re gay